serafex

Serafex · Seraf EX: your executive team

Your AI executive team: Seraf’s Council

Seraf’s Council is four personalities that each examine your decisions from their own angle: can we deliver it, what proves it, who wants it, what does it cost and what does it commit us to. They answer separately, Seraf brings you one recommendation, disagreements included, and you decide. Six Workspace agents then do the work in your tools, backed by workshops that learn from every job.

Seraf’s personalities4Leadership seats39Workspace agents6

Who does what: the Council, Seraf, the agents and you

In a small business, operations, numbers, customers and legal often rest on one person, late at night. And a single opinion, even a good one, mostly sees what it is looking for. The Council keeps those perspectives apart and makes them answer each other.

  1. The Council weighs in

    The Council weighs in. Seraf first reads the facts in your Workspace, then consults the personalities the question needs: one when a single angle is enough, all four in a debate when the options compete or the decision changes how the business runs.

  2. One voice

    Seraf answers, you decide. You don’t get a discussion to referee: Seraf brings you one recommendation, the remaining objections with their author, and the next step. A recommendation is never a decision: the final say is yours.

  3. The right agent

    The right agent does the work. When you confirm, the work goes out with the Council’s conclusions: Aurel prepares the invoice, Neri the email, Ordan the task. Anything that leaves the business, a send, an issued invoice or a publication, waits for your click.

The personalities and agents are not people: they are AI roles built into Seraf. The real people are the Serafex team, who support you separately. The guide An AI executive team for your company explains the principle in detail.

Four personalities in Seraf, six agents in the Workspace

Your team works on two levels that never mix. In Seraf, the Council thinks: it has no tools and touches nothing. In your Workspace, the agents act: they do the confirmed work in your tools. Between the two, one voice: Seraf.

In Seraf

4personalities39 seats

In Seraf: the Council. Each personality has its charter: what it examines, the questions it always asks, what it refuses to do. It has its own library of methods, 288 in all: the critical path of a job, an A/B test with its stopping rule, the leak in a sales path, a project’s risks ranked from worst to least serious. For each question, it picks at most three and reads them in full before answering. And when a number has to be exact, the model doesn’t calculate it: 29 programmed calculations do, and they wait for missing data instead of guessing it.

  • Operations8 seats

    Flow, stock, capacity and the real date

    Its questionWhat really sets the date, and can the team hold it?

  • Evidence6 seats

    Premises, measures and the smallest test

    Its questionIs it the right problem, and what proves it?

  • Growth12 seats

    Demand, conversion and go-to-market

    Its questionWho really wants it, and where does the sale leak?

  • Finance and legal7 seats

    Money, contracts and security, worst first

    Its questionWhat does it cost, what does it commit us to, and what could break?

In your Workspace

6agents

In your Workspace: six agents. Each one has its own trade, its own spaces and its own limits. They do the work you confirmed, and only that work.

What each personality really does

Each personality has its own questions, methods and exact calculations. Here is what it does for you, on a real small-business situation, and what it refuses to do.

Flow, stock, capacity and the real date8 seats

Operations

What really sets the date, and can the team hold it?

Operations looks at how work and goods move through your business: who does what, in what order, with what stock, at which workstation, and what sets the real date. It treats the business like a workshop and a warehouse: an order, a part or a task in the wrong place costs transport, stockouts and rework.

Its methods
  • The critical path: from the tasks, their dependencies and their durations, the chain that sets the real date, with tasks that have no owner, loops and forgotten dependencies exact calculation.
  • Workload against capacity: the work promised compared with the time the team really has, over the same period. Without the share of time that is truly productive, it says so instead of guessing exact calculation.
  • The most economical order: for a product you buy often, the order size and frequency that cost the least, with the average stock and the yearly cost exact calculation.
  • The process map: every step, queue, handoff and check of a real process, to find the exact place where work sits waiting.
  • The layout: how the workshop, the warehouse or the workstations are arranged, to cut walking, crossings and tool hunting.
  • The right indicator: for each decision, a defined indicator (stock, turnover, service rate), its source, its frequency and the person who keeps it up.
In practice
  1. The situationA cabinetmaking shop has sold three kitchens for December, and a fourth client wants to sign.
  2. What it doesIt traces the critical path of each job, from ordering materials to installation, and compares the promised workload with the shop’s real time, station by station.
  3. What it findsThe team has the time. The bottleneck is the finishing booth, already booked three weeks out of four, and nobody is in charge of following the hardware order.
  4. Its recommendationTake the fourth client for a January installation rather than December, and name someone to follow the hardware order.
  5. Your decisionThe date you promise the client.

It refusesTo promise a date without the sequence of steps, to approve a hire or an expense, and to infer a duration or a stock level from a mere title.

In the appPipelineInventoryCalendar

Premises, measures and the smallest test6 seats

Evidence

Is it the right problem, and what proves it?

Evidence puts proof under every claim before anyone builds on it. It checks the question before the answer: is the number measured, assumed, or created by the way it was measured? It traces back to the real cause and returns the smallest credible version of a project, with the test that would change its mind.

Its methods
  • The real cause: several chains of “why” and a sorting of causes, from most to least frequent. Each link is either evidence or a declared assumption, never a certainty.
  • A test before changing everything: an A/B test prepared in advance, with its hypothesis, its main measure and its stopping rule, then the gap between the two versions and its margin of error exact calculation.
  • A real gap or noise: a review of an analysis, from the sample to the missing data, before concluding that a difference really matters exact calculation.
  • The standard time: a traceable time study, with the observed pace and justified allowances, to know how long a task really takes before pricing it exact calculation.
  • Your procedures and routings: a written procedure, work instruction or manufacturing routing, with its inputs, its checks and the person who signs it off.
  • A goal you can check: a starting point, a target, a measure and a date. No starting measure, no target.
In practice
  1. The situationOnline sales have been dropping for two months, and the team wants to redo the whole website.
  2. What it doesIt traces several chains of “why”, separates what is measured from what is assumed, and checks whether the drop goes beyond the usual variation in sales.
  3. What it findsThe drop mostly hits one product family, since a price change. Everywhere else, sales stay within their normal variation.
  4. Its recommendationDon’t redo the website. Test the old price against the new one on that family, with a stopping rule set in advance.
  5. Your decisionLaunching the test, and what you will do with its result.

Demand, conversion and go-to-market12 seats

Growth

Who really wants it, and where does the sale leak?

Growth follows your customers’ path, from the stranger searching to the customer who comes back, and looks for the step where the sale leaks. It measures what pays (qualified visits, requests, sales, repeat purchases) rather than reach, and fixes the leak before buying more traffic.

Its methods
  • The leak in the path: the rate of each step, from visit to sale and then to repeat purchase, to find the one that limits everything else exact calculation.
  • Google Ads, now or not: a “good idea now” or “bad idea now” verdict based on eight conditions, from a real demand signal to the capacity to deliver. It never proposes a budget.
  • The page that converts: what makes people drop a page or a quote form, and what to change first.
  • A clear offer: what you deliver, the guarantee, the name and the price, built from what your customer wants to get.
  • Price and churn: the effect of a price increase under several retention scenarios, and what fewer departing customers really brings in exact calculation.
  • Your website’s marketing brief: your positioning, your audiences and your proof, sourced and approved by you; the Website workshop starts from this brief instead of inventing.
In practice
  1. The situationYou want to launch Google Ads to fill the spring calendar.
  2. What it doesIt checks its eight conditions, then follows the path, from the Google search to the quote request.
  3. What it findsThe demand is there, but quote requests aren’t measured, and the form makes people give up: too many required fields, the budget among them.
  4. Its recommendationBad idea now. Fix the form and the measurement, clarify the spring offer, then come back to the question.
  5. Your decisionWhen to come back to the question, and the budget, which it never proposes.

It refusesTo authorize spending, to set a budget, to buy traffic before the offer is tested, and to call reach that doesn’t sell a “success”.

In the appSEOLoyaltyContent

Money, contracts and security, worst first7 seats

Finance and legal

What does it cost, what does it commit us to, and what could break?

Finance and legal assumes something will go wrong and looks for what would cost the most: money, a contract, a company obligation or an access. It follows the problem to the end of its consequences, ranks the risks from worst to least serious, and asks for proof before any reassurance. For a contract or an obligation, it flags the risky points and prepares the questions for your lawyer or your accountant.

Its methods
  • The amounts in a contract: subtotal, taxes, payment schedule and total recalculated and reconciled to the cent before you sign exact calculation.
  • The end-of-period file: income taxes, sales taxes, payroll and slips reconciled to the cent, ready for your accountant’s review exact calculation.
  • Correct invoices: every line, the subtotal, the taxes and the total checked before the invoice is issued. A piece of data is missing? The invoice waits exact calculation.
  • Splitting an amount: each partner’s share or a partner’s commission according to the agreed rates, which must add up to the exact total exact calculation.
  • Ranked risks: every way something can go wrong, with money, access or a supplier, scored by severity and likelihood, each with an owner.
  • A backup that really works: a restore tested separately, not just a backup that was declared, and overly broad access spotted before it gets used.
In practice
  1. The situationA client asks for a 15% discount to sign a three-year contract.
  2. What it doesIt recalculates the contract to the cent, taxes and payment schedule included, then flags what the contract says about renewal and late payment.
  3. What it findsThe new total holds, taxes included. But the contract renews automatically on the same terms, and no clause covers a late payment.
  4. Its recommendationAccept the discount only with a renewal to review and a late-payment clause, and ask your lawyer those two questions before signing.
  5. Your decisionWhether to sign, with your lawyer’s advice.

It refusesTo sign, file, pay or represent you. Your accountant and your lawyer keep their professional acts.

In the appFinancesDocumentsSettings

The 39 seats: who watches what, and when

A complete executive team has 39 seats. A seat is not a person: it is a written mandate, held by a personality or by Seraf itself, that says what it watches, what it can recommend and what it never does. The seats don’t all sit at once: they are arranged in four rings, from the most frequent to the rarest.

  1. Every morning7 seats

    Seven seats look at the business every morning, even when nothing moves: overall direction and coordination, which Seraf holds itself, then operations, revenue, money, technology and your customers. The CEO, COO, CFO and CTO each have their own article on the blog.

    What they watchTwo priorities that contradict each otherA customer invoice that is overdueA follow-up that is getting oldA promise made to a customer and not yet kept

  2. On an important signal8 seats

    Eight seats join when an important signal touches their field: marketing (CMO), product, engineering, the team (human resources), AI, data, security and legal. The rest of the time, they stay quiet: a seat with no signal doesn’t fill your brief.

    What they watchA campaign that driftsUnusual access to your accountsA backup that failsA legal deadline coming up

  3. On a concrete signal12 seats

    Twelve hands-on seats review a specific fact that needs a look: a quote, a draft, a delivery, an invoice, a supplier or a document. They bring it to Seraf with its source and the person concerned, without ever acting themselves.

    What they watchA quote with no follow-upA task with no ownerA draft due without its sourceA supplier about to renew

  4. On a specific question12 seats

    Twelve advisors only sit when you ask a specific question: a major purchase, a supplier everything depends on, a new market, a transaction, or coaching you ask for yourself. Seraf holds four of these seats itself, the board among them.

    What they watchA major purchase to compareA supplier everything depends onA new market to openA choice with heavy consequences

Each seat also has its forbidden moves, written into its mandate. The money seat watches overdue invoices, upcoming payments and tax deadlines; it never pays, files or makes a call on your behalf.

How it works: facts first, then the views

From your question to the finished work, the path is always the same. What changes is the number of views: Seraf consults what the question calls for, no more.

  1. You talk to Seraf. In writing or out loud, in the AI dashboard or from any page of the app.
  2. Seraf gathers the facts. It reads what the question depends on itself: calendar, invoices, Pipeline, documents, company memory. It turns them into a file that says where each fact came from. The personalities have no tools: they cite only that file.
  3. Seraf chooses who to consult. A single personality when one angle is enough. Two to four views side by side when several angles shed light on the question. A debate when the options compete, a premise is doubtful or the decision changes how the business runs.
  4. Independent views. Each personality picks its methods, then answers without seeing the others: its findings, its assumptions, what it doesn’t know and what it recommends.
  5. The debate. Each one answers the others’ objections, naming who said what, and says whether its position changes and why. Two rounds at most; the debate stops as soon as nobody moves.
  6. An honest synthesis. The points of agreement, the objections with their author, a recommendation that says yes, not as is, or no, the questions still open, the next step and what would make it change. A disagreement stays a disagreement.
  7. You decide, the work goes out. Seraf handles the simple steps itself, such as a task or a meeting, or hands the production to the right agent with the Council’s conclusions.

A simple question, whose answer is already in front of Seraf, doesn’t go to the Council. During a consultation, the “Consulting the Council” step appears live, and you can stop Seraf at any time.

The six agents in your Workspace

In your Workspace, six agents surround Seraf. Each one has its own trade and its own spaces. Specialist work, such as an article, a newsletter or a page, goes to the workshop that does that trade and comes back in your brief, ready to approve.

  • Neri · Chief of staff and communications. Neri keeps your conversations and your day in order, in Messaging, Email and the Calendar.

    • Your unread items: a pass through your emails and conversations, one line per message, then “What do you want to reply?”.
    • Your replies: you say what to answer; the email is written for you and comes back for approval.
    • Your meetings: a meeting with a colleague or someone outside the company, an invitation accepted, your week laid out hour by hour.
    • Your reminders: “remind me to call Paul on Thursday” becomes a reminder, and a block of time is set aside for focused work.
    • Your attachments: a file from your Documents attached to a conversation, ready to go.

    Your clickNo message leaves without your click on Send.

    Its spacesMessagingEmailCalendar

  • Aurel · Accounting and finance lead. Aurel keeps track of the money coming in and going out, in the Finances space.

    • Your invoices: a draft as soon as you ask, one line per amount, GST and QST added from your company’s numbers, a recurring service with its period.
    • Who owes you what: overdue invoices, amounts received and due, the status of a reported Interac transfer.
    • Your expenses: a receipt from your Documents filed, then classified in the year’s workbook with its supplier, category and taxes.
    • Your files: accounting, tax and payroll, each with its documents, its points to check and the reviewer’s decision.
    • Specialist work: bookkeeping, a tax filing, payroll, a reconciliation or a balance sheet becomes a request sent to the right people.

    Your click“Issue and send” and “Payment received” stay your clicks. Aurel never pays, never files and never marks an invoice as paid.

    Its spacesInvoicesAccountingTax and payroll

  • Ordan · Projects and operations manager. Ordan keeps your team’s tasks and projects in the Pipeline.

    • Your tasks: “a task for Friday” becomes a task with its due day, on your board or a team’s.
    • Your projects: a new project from a template, with its dates, members and stages, in the Projects view; reusable departments and project templates.
    • Your late items: overdue tasks presented one by one, then what you want to do with them: move, reschedule, check off.
    • Your week: a pass through this week’s tasks, in board order.
    • Your notes: a note added to a task, a task moved to another list or checked off.
    • Follow-ups: a follow-up task tied to a company file, and the follow-ups the Council proposes in your brief.

    Your clickOrdan never deletes or archives a task; you archive it.

    Its spacesPipeline

  • Zadiel · Legal and compliance lead. Zadiel follows your contracts and your company files, in the Finances space.

    • Your contracts: who needs to act, the missing steps and what is waiting for a signature. A contract you receive is signed through your secure link.
    • Your legal files: corporate, privacy and security, by legal entity, with their documents, their points to check and their history.
    • A review to decide: approve, request changes or decline, once you have ticked “I have checked”.
    • Specialist work: legal drafting, a compliance, privacy or security review, an incident response, a continuity plan, sent to the specialists.

    Your clickNo legal advice, no signature in your name. A review decision stays yours.

    Its spacesContractsLegal and corporatePrivacy and security

  • Luma · Creative and content director. Luma looks after what your website shows, in the Content space.

    • Your approvals: pages, articles, FAQs, guides and mockups waiting for your approval, presented one by one.
    • A correction: you ask for a change in your own words, and the new version comes back.
    • A mockup: approving a revision starts building the site, without publishing anything.
    • An order: an article, an FAQ, a page or a redesign becomes a request for the Website workshop.
    • The right states: approved, published, verified online and indexed are four separate states. Luma only says “published” with proof.

    Your clickDeclining a page is final, and it is your click.

    Its spacesWebsite content

  • Veya · Marketing and loyalty lead. Veya looks after your visibility and your loyal customers, in the SEO and Loyalty spaces.

    • Your SEO results: the SEO page opened on your visibility, the crawls of your site, your local presence or your link reports. No number is quoted without having been read.
    • Your keyword plan: your answers (services, priorities, areas, competitors) and your final choice among the options offered.
    • Your newsletters: monthly, win-back for inactive customers, after-service follow-up, loyalty, referral request, repeat purchase, Christmas.
    • Your contacts: their consent, their unsubscribes, an imported file, the sign-up box on your website.
    • Real results: sent, delivered, failed. Never an invented open rate.

    Your clickOnly the account owner approves a newsletter, exact version. No advertising spend.

    Its spacesSEOLoyalty

Behind the agents: workshops that learn from every job

The agents don’t make everything themselves. When a job needs a specialist, a page, an article, a campaign, a visual or a document, Seraf sends it into production at Serafex, to the workshop for that trade. Whether the request comes from your conversation with Seraf, from an agent or from your plan’s calendar, it follows the same path. Each workshop has its own methods, knowledge base and memory, and every job makes it better.

The workshop plans, writes, designs and publishes your pages, and checks how they render on desktop and phone before showing them to you. See the Website plan.

  1. The request becomes a file. Seraf recognizes the kind of work and opens a file that keeps your request word for word, then the plan, the decisions and the evidence. A sensitive request, one that touches a payment, a contract, an access or a deletion, never goes into production on its own.
  2. Scouts first. Before writing anything, scout agents read the sources without touching anything: what already exists, your profile, your constraints.
  3. A complete plan before acting. Every step has its exact files, its moves and its mandatory checks. Nothing starts before the plan is complete, and nothing is written outside it.
  4. Builders at work. Each builder carries out its step of the plan, alongside the others when the steps don’t depend on each other.
  5. An independent reviewer. Another agent reviews the result without being able to change it. No agent approves its own work, and an unresolved problem blocks what comes next.
  6. Evidence before “done”. Tests, screenshots and checks: a final gate checks every condition before the job is declared finished.
  7. Delivered, but nothing is published. The work comes back to your brief, ready to approve. The workshop publishes and sends nothing itself: going live or sending waits for your click.
  8. A review at the end. The workshop looks back at what happened and files what is worth keeping in its knowledge base and memory, even when the answer is “nothing to change”.
Demo · sample job, simplified log

An improvement has to prove it does better. A lesson becomes a correction to the workshop’s instructions, and the mistake that was spotted becomes a test case, so it doesn’t come back. The correction is replayed on the test cases, before and after: if a single case that worked starts failing, it is refused; if nothing improves, it is refused too.

What one workshop learns benefits all of them. A fix to the shared engine, tested in one workshop, is picked up by the workshop that maintains all the others, replayed on each one, then applied everywhere. And when several approaches are possible, an optimization campaign compares them on the same test bench, same cases and same judge: a version is only adopted if it beats the current one by more than the measurement noise.

What the Council and the agents never do

Each role has reserved actions, written down in black and white in its mandate. A few examples:

  • The four personalities: no tools, no access to your accounts. They advise from the file Seraf gives them, and never send, pay, sign or publish anything.
  • No invented numbers: a missing fact stays “to be confirmed”, and a calculation missing a piece of data stays on hold rather than being estimated.
  • Neri: no email leaves without your click on Send.
  • Aurel: no payment, no filing, and never an invoice marked paid on your behalf.
  • Zadiel: no legal advice, no signature in your name.
  • Veya: no newsletter sent without your approval of the exact version, no advertising spend.

For an accounting, tax or legal question, Finance and legal prepares the file: the sources, the risks and the questions to ask. The answer is still your accountant’s, your tax specialist’s or your lawyer’s.

While you sleep

The brief prepared overnight

Every night around 3 a.m., in your company’s time zone, the Council prepares the company brief. It starts from what is actually happening: the work waiting for your approval, the services in your plan, your follow-ups in the Pipeline, your meetings and invoices, your SEO results, your newsletter, your connected tools and the dates of the next six months, from Mother’s Day to Black Friday.

Each personality first does its own analysis, then they debate. The result is short: three priorities at most, each with the fact behind it and the decision waiting for you, then three proposals at most, in this order: the follow-ups to make, a seasonal action prepared one to three months ahead, a tool to connect or repair. A proposal already made doesn’t come back.

Between 4 and 7 a.m., Seraf prepares your morning brief: first what the Council recommends, then your day, what is waiting for your answer and your results. Seraf can read it to you out loud, point by point. Each proposal has its own button, to schedule, do, prepare or launch it with Seraf, and nothing starts before you agree.

Demo screenshot, labels in French: the Workspace home, Seraf’s orb and today’s tiles (emails, appointments, tasks, invoices).
Demo · French screen, overlay labels translated · sample data

Frequently asked questions about the Council

SerafOnline

Why four personalities rather than a single opinion?

Because a single opinion, even a good one, mostly sees what it is looking for. Each personality stays on its angle and first answers without seeing the others, so nobody simply lines up behind the first answer. What belongs to another one, it flags without taking it over. And when they don’t agree, Seraf shows you the disagreement instead of erasing it.

Does the Council debate every request?

No. A simple question, whose answer is in front of Seraf, doesn’t go to the Council. Seraf consults a single personality when one angle is enough, several views side by side when several angles help, and a real debate when the options compete or the decision changes how the business runs.

Can the personalities make up a number?

No. They have no tools and only cite the facts Seraf read in your Workspace, with their source. A missing fact stays “to be confirmed”. Exact figures, such as a project’s critical path, the gap in an A/B test or the amounts in a contract, go through 29 programmed calculations; if a piece of data is missing, the calculation stays on hold instead of being estimated.

What are the 39 seats?

They are the 39 written mandates of a complete executive team. Each seat is held by a personality, or by Seraf itself for six of them, the CEO among them, and says what it watches, what it can recommend and what it never does. They are arranged in four rings: seven look at the business every morning, eight join on an important signal, twelve review a concrete signal, and twelve only sit for a specific question.

Do I talk directly to the personalities or the agents?

No. You talk to Seraf, and Seraf alone answers you: one recommendation rather than a discussion to referee. It then hands the work to the right agent.

Can I ask for the Council’s view on a specific decision?

Yes. Ask Seraf, for example “Is this the right time to hire?” or “How do I find a second supplier?”. For a decision, it brings you a recommendation and what would change it; for a “how do I”, the approach itself, step by step. The decision stays yours.

What does the Council prepare overnight?

The company brief, once a night for each account: three priorities at most and three proposals at most, drawn from what is happening in your business. Its items are added to the morning brief of every member of the team, and each person only sees what their access allows. If the Council hasn’t finished in time, your brief is picked up again as soon as it’s ready.

Do Seraf and its workshops get better over time?

Yes, and measurably. Every job ends with a review: the workshop files what it learned in its knowledge base and corrects its instructions. A correction is only kept if it does better on test cases without breaking anything that worked, and an improvement to the shared engine is tested on every workshop before it is applied everywhere.

Which AI model does the Council run on?

On your company’s: the model included in your plan, or your ChatGPT or your Claude if you connected it in Settings. The Council only sees what your access opens to it: your spaces, your Google or Microsoft connections and the company memory.

All frequently asked questions →

Prepare for a decision with Seraf and its team

Bring a decision that is on your mind right now: together we’ll see how Seraf, its Council and its agents can help you prepare for it. The Platform page presents the spaces where Seraf works.

Updated on October 18, 2026.